Skip to main content

The Grey Zone: The Menendez Brothers


I choose this picture because no matter how hard we try to look at this case with emotional detatchment to arrive at the most legal answer we should keep in mind that they were real people, who went through severe traumatic experiences. It captures something that words can't descrive: the insidious nature of control the father had over Lyle who clearly looks uncomfortable compared to Lyle whose innocent smile is truly heartbreaking as he wasn't aware of what was happening.

Were the Menendez brothers rightfully convicted for the murder of their parents Jose and Mary Louise Menendez? Let me lay out the facts, the firearms used in the crime were purchased two days before the act. Their testimony stated that they were purchased as means of “protection” from the imminent dangers posed to them by their parents, this reason, even if it was true, seems skeptical considering the close proximity between the dates of the purchase and the murder. If killing them was truly “self defense” it must have occurred as a retaliation to active harm. The purchase of guns seems premeditated to rule out active self defence. 

If threat was truly imminent they would not have had the opportunity to take extra “precautions”; alternative options were provided given the circumstances—they were legal adults 18 and 21, they had the freedom of leaving the house, they were not immured, leaving the possibility of reaching out for help or informing the authorities of the threat was available. Murder should only be permissible if it is truly the last resort and that sort of situation is rare to come across in life. In their case murder was clearly not the last option; their actions cannot be dismissed as self defence.


After the shooting, the brothers called 911 claiming that they “found” their parents dead, a fabrication that we come to know after their corollary admission to shooting them themselves. The initial cover up demonstrates consciousness of guilt. If it was truly self defense, coming clean about the events that occurred prior to the murder would have been the most logical.


From the evidence of child abuse experienced by the Menedez brothers, their actions could be considered as an act of retaliation, fueled by revenge; they were wronged, no one can deny it; the consonant trauma and manipulation could have possibly made them think that even law enforcement couldn’t save them from their parents wrath and if they needed to be free the only option was to get rid of them by themselves.


The voluntary, conscious act of taking someone's life is murder by definition, if someone commits murder it warrants being charged for it, the only thing that could sway the punitive ruling is limited to the circumstances surrounding the act. The actus reus of taking a life is inherently wrong, yet the antecedent abuse, both mental and physical, does justify a lax ruling as compared to murder with intent.


Popular posts from this blog

A Cruelly Perfect Machine

There is something intimate about being yourself. To be in control of something inexplicable, unknowable even to itself. It indeed is a strange realization that you have unbridled power over everything —over your actions, your thoughts, the way you interact with your environment. Nothing is left to chance.  But to think about control in the sense of yourself can go two ways.  It is a blessing that our mind was put in a body capable of experience, of life, of love and many such emotions that the price outweighs any lack. Of course, not all are blessed with perfection, but if anything, at least to make the best of what one has, one should feel a twinge of gratitude in life itself. Even for the small moments. But that aside, the fact that our mind and body is our own is astounding, akin to the feeling one might have at the thought of their children, their own in so many ways ineffaceable. However, there are parts of ourselves we don't command. Our irrational fears, intrusive tho...

The Study Strategy That Got Me Through 10th Grade

 Ever since my board exams began, I’ve been reflecting on how I studied and what actually worked. I feel like I’ve cracked a secret code—one that transformed the way I approach learning. Maybe this just worked for me, but if there’s even a small chance it helps you, I’d love to share it. And trust me, as a straight-A student, I know what I’m talking about (well, mostly!). When I started 10th grade, I was just as clueless as anyone else. I assumed that the same level of effort that got me through 9th grade would be enough to excel in boards. Oh, how wrong I was. The more time I spent in 10th grade, the more I realized that it wasn’t just about studying—it was about understanding. My grandmother always used to tell me to “go in-depth” when learning, and I never really understood what she meant until now. Going in-depth means asking why, questioning everything, and truly engaging with the material. When you do that, information actually sticks. Think about it—our minds have an insan...

Nature Outlaws Definition

  “If everyone is just a product of their environment” I used to ask myself “what then, is me?”. A person born with a silver spoon, for example, would never have the same entitlement as one born not as fortunate. The evils that reside in few may not have permeated if they had someone to look out for them, care for them, and value them as human.  Circumstances, in life, play a huge role in shaping each person. Their family, friends, relationships, opportunities, mishaps—all are lego bricks that form a part of a never finished sculpture. John Locke said our mind is a tabula rasa or blank slate; no one is born of innate ideas, instead, one forms them as we humans are perceptive creatures, we emulate, we mix and match the extant in ways that may be unique but never not existing in the world.  I agree, perhaps we are of a blank slate at birth—our environment, then, controls the brush, painting cryptics that will never be, in its entirety, intelligible maybe until the brush fal...